Jackson the Theater Organist, Part II

Jackson is best remembered for his work at the Atlanta Fox. For example, the only photograph of Jackson included in Ben Hall’s The Best Remaining Seats (1961), which is still the authoritative survey of picture palaces, shows him at the console of the Fox’s Möller De Luxe organ.

This is an older Jackson, however. The photo is undated, but this is not the twenty-something phenomenon who wowed black and white audiences at the “81.” While the Atlanta color barriers did come down in Jackson’s lifetime, his early appearances at the Fox could not have been as the theater organist. Instead, he took the console for live performance only under rather unusual circumstances.

I will let Constitution theater columnist and associate editor Ralph T. Jones tell this story in his own words, published on January 3, 1932. They are exceptionally entertaining.

Last Wednesday night, after the final performance at the Fox theater, a group of Atlanta’s more serious thinkers were indulging in a fascinating discussion along philosophical and metaphysical lines. There were, perhaps, a hundred in the party, which had been arranged for the advancement of ratiocinative analysis. Together, with the more aesthetic enjoyment, the company enjoyed a modicum of harmonic rhythm supplied by a musical aggregations of Afroamericans.

About 2 a. m., seeking surcease from their melodious labors, the orchestra mentioned in the preceding paragraph laid aside the reed and the brass, the cymbal and the drum. But their leader, whose wizardry at the piano had already attracted about four-fifths of the company present to his corner, scorned idle inactivity. On the invitation of Manager Carter Barron he mounted the console stool of the big Fox organ and, with unspoken acquiescence, prepared to play anything the assembled company might request.

Then, with delighted ears and throbbing pulse, we heard the organ played as no organ has ever been played before—except when Graham Jackson was at the console. This colored genius of tone and rhythm, this rather small, average looking Atlanta negro marvel, made that great organ sound like a divine orchestra of three-score master musicians. He metaphorically took it to tiny pieces and scattered them in drops of musical delight all over the big theater. Then he rolled it all up into one mighty instrument once again and made it dance, roll over, play dead, sit up and say “Mama.”

He played “Poet and Peasant” overture as a pious lover of music might dream of hearing it played by a company of archangels. Even as the final thundering chord of the tremendous overture died in the far reaches of the theater roof, the body of the master swayed on the console seat. It swayed in that inimitable rhythm swing that only the sons and daughters of Africa know, and the moaning, entrancing broken strains of “St. Louis Blues” sobbed all around. Two minutes more and he had native Georgians and visitors from the wilds of New Jersey singing together in delirious delight, “Glory to Old Georgia” and “Rambling Wreck.” Then popular song succeeded Chopin prelude and strains of Beethoven followed hard on dance room jazz.

Later, Jackson sat again at his piano with his orchestra mates around him and performed prodigious on the piano keys as marvelous as he had achieved at the organ. He plays the organ or the piano, or any of a dozen other instruments as no other can. His style, his technique are his own, unique. And he is one of the marvels of the modern age.

Graham Jackson is an Atlanta negro. He refuses to leave this city, his home, despite the riches and fame that would inevitably be his could his genius be properly presented in New York and other great cities of the world. These paragraphs have been written with one purpose, and only one, in view. That is, whenever any of you who read have an opportunity to hear Graham Jackson, seize it as you would an invitation to a concert by the most famous musicians of the age. You will hear something different, to be sure, but something gorgeously entertaining and magic in its rendition. For that is the way Graham Jackson plays.

Whew. I will make a few numbered observations about this extraordinary review.

1. Jones is genuinely enthusiastic about Jackson’s musicianship, both in this review and others. He pays Jackson a great compliment in describing him as “unique,” instead of as a typically gifted black musician, and as “one of the marvels of the modern age,” not one of the marvels of his race. All the same, Jones can’t help stereotyping Jackson as a “son of Africa,” possessed with the rhythmic sense and embodied performance style that is natural to black musicians. Of course, this is typical of every review of Jackson’s work. The most notable thing about Jones’s racial stereotyping is its insignificance compared to his other observations.

2. The setting for this performance is very important. Jackson and his band—the Seminole Syncopators, a popular dance ensemble in Atlanta society—are only welcome at the Fox after dark, in the middle of the night, when the atmosphere changes and social barriers are relaxed. Were there women present? I would guess not, given Jones’s description of “serious thinkers.” Jackson’s uniquely African music is invited into a space of adventure and experimentation, and is appreciated by cultural elites who enjoy total control over the situation.

3. Along with most other reviewers, Jones lays emphasis on Jackson’t extraordinary facility with most every instrument. Others observe that Jackson never received any formal training (not true) and simply picked up instruments from his boyhood with the effortless talent of his race.

4. Another common observation is that Jackson lives only to make music. He never tires, never becomes cross, and gives no thought to anything other than performing—a great relief, I am sure, to white audiences who feared black unrest. Jackson could be counted on never to resent his position and never to ask for anything special in return for his services. It appears that he was genuinely happy, as well as energetic and hard working. I am still trying to uncover his motivations and personal thoughts.

5. Along those lines: how exactly was this performance by the Seminole Syncopators arranged? Jones makes it all sound spontaneous, but that is impossible. How much were they paid? What did the contract specify? The band is portrayed as lazy for knocking off at 2am, while Jackson is lauded for scorning “idle inactivity” and carrying on at the organ. The echoes of slavery cannot be ignored here.

6. Jackson’s repertoire here is typical. Franz von Suppé’s “Poet and Peasant” overture was his signature piece, and “St. Louis Blues” also featured regularly in his performances.

7. This is the only reference to Jackson leading community singing that I have found!

Jackson the Theater Organist

The papers of Graham W. Jackson first caught my eye because the short biography provided in the Atlanta History Center finding aid mentioned that he had worked as a theater organist. Further investigation revealed that he actually broadcast a radio program from the Fox Theater, where I did dissertation research three years ago. Jackson’s career as a theater organist ended early and was fairly insignificant compared to his other activities, but a quick examination provides interesting information all the same.

According to a 1937 Constitution article, Jackson first came to Atlanta to take the post of organist at the “81” Theater, where the management convinced him to take up permanent residence in the city. Unfortunately, I am faced with a shortage of resources here. The Jackson papers at the Atlanta History Center do not include any materials concerning the “81,” other than a couple of 1926 letters addressed to Jackson at the theater. The “81,” of course, was an African American theater. (I say “of course” with some humor here, because I’m still a bit naïve where the Jim Crow South is concerned and this fact actually hadn’t occurred to me, which led to some confusion when reading Constitution accounts.) While I am trying to track down some African American newspapers from this time, I currently only have access to the Constitution—and the Constitution only talked about “81” performances that were staged for white audiences. I therefore have a very narrow and skewed view, although it is valuable for that very reason. What we see in the pages of the Constitution reveals white attitudes toward black performers that extend back for well over a century.

The biography that accompanies the finding aid for the Graham W. Jackson, Sr., Papers at the Atlanta-Fulton Public Library Research Library on African American Culture and History—of which I only recently became aware—states that Jackson came to Atlanta in 1923 to perform at both the Royal Theater, located at 323 Auburn Avenue NE, and the “81” Theater, at 81 Decatur St SE. Both were African American theaters in the Bailey chain. Decatur St was an important center for black entertainment, and the “81” Theater featured a lively mixture of stage entertainment. The “81” has already been cited as an important launchpad for the careers of both Ma Rainey and Bessie Smith, although I am having some difficulty determining a chronology for the theater. The website cinematreasures.org, usually a reliable resource, states that the “81” opened in 1929. Comments suggest that it was built around 1908 as a vaudeville house and renovated in 1928. I know that it was called the “81” no later than 1926, however, so I will have to investigate further.

Regarding Jackson at the “81,” what I have right now are three Constitution articles describing two midnight shows put on for whites only. The first appears to have belonged to a series of such “midnight frolics” programs, which were staged every Friday night. This one, presented in February of 1926, featured a popularity contest in which Graham Jackson and pianist Eddie Hayward were to compete for audience applause.

For the next eighteen months there appears to have been nothing worth reporting. But on September 19, 1928, the troop of entertainers at the “81” staged a special “midnight frolic” to raise $6,000 so that the Atlanta police band could attend the 30th annual reunion of Spanish-American war veterans in Havana. This trip was a point of great pride for white Atlantans. According to the Constitution, the police band was the only American music ensemble invited to the celebration, and the occasion was considered to be a marvelous opportunity for enhancing the city’s cultural reputation. Tom Bailey, the white owner and operator of the theater, was listed as offering “the last word in negro presentations:” specifically, a show entitled “Steamboat Bill From Louisville” with a cast of twenty-five seasoned performers. Jackson did not play the organ for this fundraiser, but instead directed the pit orchestra.

Perhaps I will become numb to the execrable observations that crop up in every Constitution review of a black performer, but I haven’t yet. The columnist in this case notes that “Negroes have a reputation of being musical.” This, however, pales next to his concluding informational tidbit: “The mayor permitted the show tonight under special dispensation, having previously announced that the negro actors could not appear before white audiences in the future. The show tonight will be strictly for white persons.”

Tom Bailey himself also had a kind word to dispense: “One thing is certain, the audience enjoyed the offering and demonstrated that they appreciate the artistic even when it is offered by ‘negro’ performers.”